ATLA Logo Protecting Your Rights


News and Archives

search  





Visit the Press Room for more breaking news

Contact Chris Mather, (202) 965-3500 x369

Caps on Medical Malpractice Damages Unconstitutional,
Wisconsin Supreme Court

Court says caps bear no "rational" relationship to lower premiums

Excerpts From the Ruling:

On Victims
On Insurance Premiums
On Physician Availability
On Defensive Medicine

Complete Decision

(Thursday, July 14, 2005)—Today the Wisconsin Supreme Court struck down the state's caps on non-economic (so-called pain and suffering) damages in medical malpractice cases, saying they bear no "rational" relationship to lower malpractice insurance premiums. The Court also called such limits "unreasonable and arbitrary" because they negatively impact the most severely injured patients. Wisconsin is the 14th state to strike down caps as unconstitutional.

In its ruling, the Wisconsin court noted that the state insurance commissioner concluded "no direct correlation can be drawn between the caps enacted in 1995 and current rate changes taking place in the primary market today."

The medical malpractice bill Congress is preparing to debate would enact just such an "unreasonable and arbitrary" cap nationwide, while doing nothing to force the insurance industry to lower malpractice premiums for doctors.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruling comes just days after the release of a new study conducted by the former insurance commissioner of Missouri, Falling Claims and Rising Premiums in the Medical Malpractice Insurance Industry, which showed that in the past five years, while doctors' insurance premiums have more than doubled, malpractice claims payments have remained stable or even decreased in some cases.

"This is the smoking gun that proves the insurance industry has been misleading doctors and health care consumers," said ATLA President Todd A. Smith. "Insurance companies have been price-gouging doctors and now we know the reason—to protect their bottom line."

Smith said that frivolous lawsuits should receive nothing, but juries should be allowed to decide what is appropriate compensation for severely injured victims of medical malpractice.

# # #

As the world's largest trial bar, ATLA promotes justice and fairness for injured persons, defends the constitutional right to trial by jury, and strengthens the civil justice system through education and disclosure of information critical to public health and safety. With 60,000 members worldwide, ATLA provides lawyers with the information and professional assistance they need to serve clients successfully and protect the democratic values of the civil justice system.

Balancing the Scales of Justice
American Association for Justice
Contact Us  |  © 2008 AAJ Terms and Conditions of Use  |  Privacy Statement