Law Reporter | Products Liability Law Reporter | Professional Negligence Law Reporter
Publish your case | Other publications

Court Documents by Topic

Railroad Equipment

Documents can be downloaded from the Exchange. For security reasons, the AAJ Exchange and its products are available only to AAJ Regular, Life, Sustaining, and President’s Club members.

Documents $50

• Harris v. E. Assoc. Coal Corp., 39 ATLA L. Rep. 415 (Dec. 1996) (plaintiffs’ response to defendants’ motions for directed verdict, judgment n.o.v., and a new trial or remittitur in a case alleging a foreman operating a coal mine personnel carrier had entered onto the mainline track, violating state and federal law, company practice, and a dispatcher’s instructions). No. LR2894.

• Holdridge v. Consol. Rail Corp., 38 ATLA L. Rep. 28 (Feb. 1995) (the parties’ pretrial stipulation in a case alleging a railroad had failed to activate a railcar’s air brake and place wheel blocks on the railcar to prevent it from moving). No. LR2278.

• Stark v. Kansas S.W. Ry., 40 ATLA L. Rep. 185 (June 1997) (the parties’ pretrial conference order in a case alleging a railroad crossing was extremely hazardous in that (1) its crossbucks had lost almost all of their retroreflectivity, (2) it lacked active warning signals, and (3) it had an inadequate sight triangle). No. LR3014.

• Thayer v. Consol. Rail Corp., 42 ATLA L. Rep. 27 (Feb. 1999) (plaintiff’s trial brief in a case alleging that a railroad failed to use proper machinery and violated railroad industry custom by requiring an employee to manually carry brake valves). No. LR3364.

• Adamy v. S. Buffalo Ry. Co., 44 ATLA L. Rep. 193 (June 2001) (plaintiff’s complaint, summons, summary judgment motion and supporting memorandum, and motion to compel disclosure of a statement of defendant’s deceased employee; deposition transcripts of defendant’s employees; and the court’s order on the motion compelling disclosure in a case alleging Federal Employer Liability Act (FELA) liability and Boiler Inspection Act violations). No. LR3736.

• Boomsma v. Dakota, Minn. & E. R.R. Corp., 44 ATLA L. Rep. 276 (Sept. 2001) (plaintiffs’ complaint, briefs in opposition to defendant’s motions to exclude expert’s testimony and for summary judgment, brief and reply brief supporting motions in limine, brief supporting motion for punitive damages, response brief to motion for reconsideration, response to reply brief in support of summary judgment motion, reply brief to defendant’s response to the court’s order for further evidence, and response to order in a case alleging failure to properly warn of the presence of a flatbed car at a railroad crossing). No. LR3765.

• Dombrowski v. Consol. Rail Corp., 44 ATLA L. Rep. 236 (Aug. 2001) (plaintiffs’ summons and complaints against a railroad and the manufacturer and supplier of a defective tool, and deposition of a vocational rehabilitation expert in a case alleging FELA liability for providing a railroad employee with a defective tool). No. LR3753.

• Mosley v. Union P. R.R. Co., 44 ATLA L. Rep. 108 (Apr. 2001) (plaintiff’s notice of motion for summary judgment and supporting memorandum in a case alleging a railroad failed to have a knuckle pin in a coupler and failed to inspect a rail car). No. LR3713.

• Pfeifer v. Long Is. R.R., 37 ATLA L. Rep. 108 (Apr. 1994) (plaintiff’s memorandum of law and a medical expert’s deposition testimony in a case alleging a railroad had failed to take a locomotive involved in an electrical explosion out of service). No. LR1997.